Which three books

Asset allocation, risk, diversification and rebalancing. Pros/cons of hiring a financial advisor. Seeking advice on your portfolio?
Post Reply
travesty
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 690
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 06:13
Location: Vancouver

Which three books

Post by travesty »

If you were to recommend three books for a relatively new investor to read, in the general area of financial planning and portfolio building, which would they be, and (optionally) why?
User avatar
Peculiar_Investor
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 13268
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 14:52
Location: Calgary
Contact:

Re: Which three books

Post by Peculiar_Investor »

While technically not books, might I suggest the following:
Why? Cost is free and IMHO provides an excellent starting point for someone starting out. The above links should provide plenty of food for thought and hopefully start a newcomer on the journey to financial education.

Added: Link to Bylo's list of books.
Imagefiniki, the Canadian financial wiki New editors wanted and welcomed, please help collaborate and improve the wiki.

Normal people… believe that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain’t broke, it doesn’t have enough features yet. – Scott Adams
User avatar
tidal
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 3009
Joined: 28 Jul 2006 10:56
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: Which three books

Post by tidal »

There are many good books, but I think the single most important concept to convey is the power of compounding. I think it was Einstein who called it the 8th wonder of the world.

Even in today's low-interest, low-growth environment, it's still reasonable to think that a diversified portfolio could consistently get an after-tax, after-inflation, after-expenses return of 1%.

Yes, given our starting point, that seems over-optimistic and at the same time depressingly low. But it's ignoring the impressive power of compounding those returns.

Consider a $100,000 investment at 1% for 40 years. Instead of just being worth a final value of $140,000, the compounding effect would boost that to nearly $149,000. That's over 6% extra due to compounding. Which shows why it is so important to start early.
The future is bright for jellyfish, caulerpa taxifolia, dinoflagellates and prokaryotes... rust never sleeps... the dude abides... the stupid, it burns. (http://bit.ly/LXZsXd)
User avatar
Darrell Greenwood
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 269
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 19:40
Location: BC
Contact:

Re: Which three books

Post by Darrell Greenwood »

travesty wrote:If you were to recommend three books for a relatively new investor to read, in the general area of financial planning and portfolio building, which would they be, and (optionally) why?
The first book that should be read by anybody who is investing is:

A Random Walk Down Wall Street

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Random_W ... all_Street

Why?

"A Random Walk Down Wall Street, written by Burton Malkiel, a Princeton economist, is an influential book on the subject of stock markets which introduced the random walk hypothesis. Malkiel argues that asset prices typically exhibit signs of random walk and that one cannot consistently outperform market averages." --Wikipedia.

If one accepts Malkiel's random walk hypothesis (and I do fully) one avoids a lot of expensive mistakes.

Cheers,

Darrell
User avatar
Rickson9
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 669
Joined: 05 Apr 2011 00:00

Re: Which three books

Post by Rickson9 »

I started with Beating The Street by Peter Lynch when I was in junior high. It's a good book.
"We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are." - Anais Nin
BRIAN5000
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 9063
Joined: 08 Jun 2007 23:27

Re: Which three books

Post by BRIAN5000 »

There are many good books, but I think the single most important concept to convey is the power of compounding. I think it was Einstein who called it the 8th wonder of the world.
and right behind compounding (maybe # 9, and it was all the rage/style for a few months?), is frugality, cause you need something to compound. No matter how small save money on things you don't really want to spend your money on and spend money on the things you really like.
This information is believed to be from reliable sources but may include rumor and speculation. Accuracy is not guaranteed
ockham
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 2214
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 21:50
Location: The Prairies

Re: Which three books

Post by ockham »

Darrell Greenwood wrote:
travesty wrote:If you were to recommend three books for a relatively new investor to read, in the general area of financial planning and portfolio building, which would they be, and (optionally) why?
The first book that should be read by anybody who is investing is:

A Random Walk Down Wall Street
I don't quarrel with the importance of reading and understanding Random Walk..... but I think I'd instead recommend anything by Jack Bogle. His thesis is the same as Malkiel's, but Bogle has an enviable gift for simplification without loss that would be particularly valuable for a beginner.
User avatar
NormR
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 5234
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 11:19
Contact:

Re: Which three books

Post by NormR »

Darrell Greenwood wrote:"A Random Walk Down Wall Street, written by Burton Malkiel, a Princeton economist, is an influential book on the subject of stock markets which introduced the random walk hypothesis. Malkiel argues that asset prices typically exhibit signs of random walk and that one cannot consistently outperform market averages."
Strangely enough, the book convinced me that the EMH/CAPM was a load of crap. Keep an eye out for the graph that shows the markets not at all behaving according to theory.
User avatar
deaddog
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 3422
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 19:59
Location: Central BC/Arizona

Re: Which three books

Post by deaddog »

Firstly I would recommend “The Wealthy Barber” for basic financial planning.

Secondly O’Neil’s “How to make money in Stocks” to give a background in both fundamental and technical analysis.

Thirdly Montier’s “ Little book of Behavioral Investing” so that you will be aware of why you are making the mistakes you are bound to make.
"And the days that I keep my gratitude higher than my expectations, well, I have really good days" RW Hubbard
User avatar
AltaRed
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 33398
Joined: 05 Mar 2005 20:04
Location: Ogopogo Land

Re: Which three books

Post by AltaRed »

The OPs question was associated with the general area of financial planning and portfolio building, Why would stock books be first and foremost?

I agree with P_I's list of references. The starting point is the concept of paying yourself first. Then it is the basics of building a financial plan. Besides Finiki, I would include Sandra Foster's 'Who's minding your money' as an example of building financial knowledge. Perhaps The Wealthy Barber too but feedback I've heard is that it is a bit hokey (many years since I read it and have since forgotten it).
Imagefiniki, the Canadian financial wiki The go-to place to bolster your financial freedom
User avatar
Darrell Greenwood
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 269
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 19:40
Location: BC
Contact:

Re: Which three books

Post by Darrell Greenwood »

NormR wrote: Strangely enough, the book convinced me that the EMH/CAPM was a load of crap. Keep an eye out for the graph that shows the markets not at all behaving according to theory.
Possibly, but the hypothesis that "...asset prices typically exhibit signs of random walk and that one cannot consistently outperform market averages." is not a load of crap.

Cheers,

Darrell
User avatar
NormR
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 5234
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 11:19
Contact:

Re: Which three books

Post by NormR »

Darrell Greenwood wrote:
NormR wrote: Strangely enough, the book convinced me that the EMH/CAPM was a load of crap. Keep an eye out for the graph that shows the markets not at all behaving according to theory.
Possibly, but the hypothesis that "...asset prices typically exhibit signs of random walk and that one cannot consistently outperform market averages." is not a load of crap.
The quote requires a bit of parsing.

If the random walk part = Gaussian, then it is a huge pile of crap. Btw, what is a sign of randomness? Seems like it either is, isn't, or one doesn't know. Then we get into the question of how one can really know that something is random. But when it comes to the markets, enjoy the momentum which is a big counter example.

Consistency is also an odd requirement. After all, the market does not consistently outperform X (where X can be another benchmark, fund, etc.)

Overall, it's a very bad mental model. Bogle's CMH is much better. IMHO
User avatar
Darrell Greenwood
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 269
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 19:40
Location: BC
Contact:

Re: Which three books

Post by Darrell Greenwood »

NormR wrote: The quote requires a bit of parsing.

If the random walk part = Gaussian, then it is a huge pile of crap. Btw, what is a sign of randomness? Seems like it either is, isn't, or one doesn't know. Then we get into the question of how one can really know that something is random. But when it comes to the markets, enjoy the momentum which is a big counter example.

Consistency is also an odd requirement. After all, the market does not consistently outperform X (where X can be another benchmark, fund, etc.)

Overall, it's a very bad mental model. Bogle's CMH is much better. IMHO
I totally agree with Bogle's CMH (I had to look that acronym up). My annual costs are less than one basis point.

We seem to be coming at this from different directions. I never gamble. I know the house always wins (ok, there are fascinating edge cases but they have minimal practical consequences.)

I take the same approach with investing. None of the techniques to 'beat the house' will consistently win (insert long list of techniques here, momentum, technical analysis, best fund manager, LTCM, etc) so I don't waste time or money with them. Reading A Random Walk Down Wall Street gave me that insight. I tried to share that insight with the original poster.

Cheers,

Darrell
User avatar
Brix
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 3249
Joined: 22 Feb 2005 12:29
Location: Victoria

Re: Which three books

Post by Brix »

Charles D. Ellis, Winning the Loser's Game, which is a sexed-up retitling of an earlier edition called simply Investment Policy. Only about 140 pages, i.e. says what it needs to say without padding.
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 29494
Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
Location: Waterloo, ON
Contact:

Re: Which three books

Post by Bylo Selhi »

Three investment books writen by amateurs - moneyville.ca Blogs
I'm always looking for good books to recommend to people who want to manage their own investments. I like to see excellent design, clear writing and as little jargon as possible. Here are three I like, written by Canadian authors who are self-taught and work outside the industry. All are in soft cover. All are short (less than 200 pages)...
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
User avatar
Insomniac
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 2802
Joined: 29 Oct 2011 19:01
Location: Vancouver Island

Re: Which three books

Post by Insomniac »

All of my investment books, except one, have gone to the thrift store. I was a fan of Gordon Pape a few years ago. Now pretty well everything I need is online (I see some good links in this thread to check out).

The one book I kept was The Smartest Investment Book You'll Ever Read (Canadian Edition) by Dan Solin. For the most part, you don't need Dan's book; Google "couch potato portfolio" and read on. Yes, I do follow the couch potato strategy. I kept the book because it makes sense and is really easy to read - perfect for lending out to the young people I work with.
User avatar
ghariton
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 15954
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 18:59
Location: Ottawa

Re: Which three books

Post by ghariton »

Antti Ilmanen, Expected Returns: An Investor's Guide to Harvesting Market Returns.

Ilmanen manages to reflect the points of view of both theorists/academics and practitioners. The result is 550 very dense pages of advice on active investing. But he covers a lot of ground in a very informative way. To give you an idea, the bibliography is 24 pages in rather small type -- and he references all of that in the text.

Lots of insights. But the organization of the book is less than clear, and the result is that there is some repetition. Plus it becomes obvious that the author's mother tongue is not English.

All that said, this is far and away the best guide to active investment that I have seen.

From his summary of his summary on how to improve portfolio performance:
Risk

The simple way to boost long-run returns is to raise the weight of riskier assets in the portfolio. The more complex but better rewarding approach requires leverage. Within each asset class, buying the riskiest assets almost invariably gives worse long-term returns than levering up lower volatility assets. Even across asset classes, investors can reduce portfolio volatility by smart diversification and then convert improved risk-adjusted returns into higher raw returns by applying moderate leverage.

Horizon

Investors with a long time horizon can exploit it by over-allocating to illiquid asset classes and reaping related illiquidity premia. Other possibilities include contrarian market timing and opportunistic reinsurance underwriting.

Skill

Active investors may try to add value through skillful security selection and market timing, either in house or externally. [Note: This book is written for institutional investors.] Even when markets are not fully efficient, they are competitive enough to make the task challenging. Building an active management culture and resources internally is not easy, nor is it easy to identify consistent outperformers among external managers.

Costs

Reducing fees and other implementation costs is often the easiest way to enhance net returns....
Each point is supported by a wealth of detail and examples.

George
The juice is worth the squeeze
User avatar
Spidey
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 4556
Joined: 11 Jan 2009 19:55
Location: Ottawa

Re: Which three books

Post by Spidey »

The Four Pillars of Investing by William Bernstein
What Works on Wall Street by James O'Shaunessy
Stocks For the Long Run by Jeremy Seigel

But to add a little balance, I would then suggest, Your Money or Your Life by Viki Robin and Joe Dominguez.
If life seems jolly rotten, then there's something you've forgotten -- and that's to laugh and smile and dance and sing. - Eric Idle
gsp_
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 2318
Joined: 12 Apr 2011 17:48
Location: Montreal

Re: Which three books

Post by gsp_ »

ghariton wrote:Antti Ilmanen, Expected Returns: An Investor's Guide to Harvesting Market Returns.

The result is 550 very dense pages of advice on active investing. But he covers a lot of ground in a very informative way. To give you an idea, the bibliography is 24 pages in rather small type -- and he references all of that in the text.

Lots of insights. But the organization of the book is less than clear, and the result is that there is some repetition. Plus it becomes obvious that the author's mother tongue is not English... [Note: This book is written for institutional investors.]
Thanks for the review but this thread was about recommendations for a relatively new investor. I doubt .1% of that subset could get through this book.
User avatar
ghariton
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 15954
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 18:59
Location: Ottawa

Re: Which three books

Post by ghariton »

gsp_ wrote:Thanks for the review but this thread was about recommendations for a relatively new investor. I doubt .1% of that subset could get through this book.
Yes, but that was five months ago. By now our beginner should be ready and able to move on to more solid fare. :wink:

In my case, I read a number of introductory DIY books long, long ago. But they were all too elementary -- David Chilton level is the best way to describe them -- and I didn't take them seriously. So I tossed the books, dismissed their advice -- whatever it was -- aqnd became an uneducated speculator instead. If I had started out with a book wsith some meat in it, I would have stopped to think about it. I could have been rich today. :wink:So yes, for a few people, Ilmanen's book might not be such a bad starting place.

In any event, I welcome a move of my post by a moderator to a more appropriate thread.

George
The juice is worth the squeeze
Profit not Prophet
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 948
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 14:24
Location: Southern Ontario aka not TO

Re: Which three books

Post by Profit not Prophet »

I have not seen the investment zoo listed yet.... it was pretty good by Stephen Jarislowsky
Thorn
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 49
Joined: 07 Aug 2011 15:55

Re: Which three books

Post by Thorn »

Over the past few years, as a neophyte investor, I read a number of books and online articles, but most never really clicked with me. Probably what works for you won't strike a bell with others. My favorites are:
(1) A New Pension Plan for Canadians by Springett, which outlines a broader agenda starting with personal goals and continuing on with 5 interlocking plans - financial (saving), investing, taxation, risk (insurance) and estate. Also a nice description of key investment risks and some suggestions for managing them.
(2) The Intelligent Investor by Graham (orginally published in 1949 with the latest update commentary in 2004), the origin of value investing with a clear description of two basic approaches - defensive and enterprising. Very dense.
(3) In Your Best Interest by Cunningham, a basic introduction to the bond market for government and corporate fixed income.

Also, Devil Take the Hindmost by ?, a short but excellent cautionary tale about investor psychology in market bubbles and crashes over the past 400 years.

The random walk math suggests that market pricing mechanisms are NOT suitable for forecasting future behavior. In short, you know as much about the future as any expert. There has been a great deal of math and stats published over the past decades - in general, the more esoteric the theory, the less it has to do with real market behavior.
travesty
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 690
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 06:13
Location: Vancouver

Re: Which three books

Post by travesty »

Thanks all for the continued suggests. George - I definitely appreciate your suggest of more advanced material since as you point out, after novice comes something else. In any case, I might pick it up for myself!
User avatar
ClosetIndexer
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 267
Joined: 27 Feb 2012 02:20
Location: Vancouver, BC
Contact:

Re: Which three books

Post by ClosetIndexer »

Spidey wrote:The Four Pillars of Investing by William Bernstein
What Works on Wall Street by James O'Shaunessy
Stocks For the Long Run by Jeremy Seigel
+1
Sounds good to me, although I haven't read WWoWS yet. Four Pillars is my #1 recommendation. Next on my reading list is The Intelligent Asset Allocator, Bernstein's first, more in-depth book.

For the less-novice investor, I recommend this collection of resources by Robert T at bogleheads: http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtop ... collective
Post Reply