House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
- strathglass
- Contributor
- Posts: 357
- Joined: 15 Jan 2008 16:07
- Location: Ottawa, ON
House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
Come retirement time, my wife and I may wish to sell our house, but not buy a new place immediately ... waiting maybe 9-24 months before settling down again.
(In the meantime, we would rent and do some travelling.)
The question is, how does one safely hold the proceeds from the house sale for that period of time?
That would be somewhere from 500k to a million, and CDIC insurance maxes out at $100k.
Just looking for best practices for a scenario like this.
-Strathglass
(In the meantime, we would rent and do some travelling.)
The question is, how does one safely hold the proceeds from the house sale for that period of time?
That would be somewhere from 500k to a million, and CDIC insurance maxes out at $100k.
Just looking for best practices for a scenario like this.
-Strathglass
* - Strathglass - *
-
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: 27 Feb 2005 07:14
- Location: Canada
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
Yes, 100K per institution.That would be somewhere from 500k to a million, and CDIC insurance maxes out at $100k.
Take TD Waterhouse for example. They sell GIC's for Manulife Bank, Home Trust Company, TD Mortgage, AGF Trust, HSBC Bank, BMO, BNS, Equitable Trust, Canadian Tire Bank, TD Bank, Canadian Western Bank, TD Pacific, Canada Trust - and each would give you $100K CDIC insurance at one brokerage alone. That's over a million in insurance without leaving your discount broker.
ltr
- Bylo Selhi
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 29494
- Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
- Location: Waterloo, ON
- Contact:
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
2. Within an institution you can get $300k of insurance with one account in your name, another in your spouse's name and a third held jointly.
3. Most banks have multiple separately-insured entities. For example, BNS has ScotiaBank, ScotiaMortgage, Montreal Trust and National Trust. (And in a way also TINGerine and iTrade.) You can buy short term GICs from any/all of them.
Using 2. and 3. you could have $1.2M at one bank all fully CDIC insured.
3. Most banks have multiple separately-insured entities. For example, BNS has ScotiaBank, ScotiaMortgage, Montreal Trust and National Trust. (And in a way also TINGerine and iTrade.) You can buy short term GICs from any/all of them.
Using 2. and 3. you could have $1.2M at one bank all fully CDIC insured.
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
Niggly correction. iTrade sells GICs but does not have their own.... so only $1million per couple in the BNS family. Unless you count Hollis (Dundee) bank ISA too but not clear to me how 'separate' the ISA is.
But yes, it is rather easy to cover $1-2million in cash with CDIC insurance.
But yes, it is rather easy to cover $1-2million in cash with CDIC insurance.
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki The go-to place to bolster your financial freedom
- Bylo Selhi
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 29494
- Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
- Location: Waterloo, ON
- Contact:
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
Niggly corrections
(*) Some discount brokers even have several distinct HISA securities, TDB8150, TDB8155, TDB8159 for TDW, and RBF2010, RBF2020, RBF2030, RBF2040 at RBCDI, each of which qualify for separate CDIC coverage.
Yabbut as like_to_retire mentioned as 1., discount brokers offer GICs and HISAs(*) from a variety of institutions so you can stash multiples of $100k at the same broker.iTrade sells GICs but does not have their own
Check yer 'rithmetic. SB, SM, MT, NT are four entities. Self, spouse and joint are three separate "individuals." So 4 x 3 x $100k = $1.2Monly $1million per couple in the BNS family
(*) Some discount brokers even have several distinct HISA securities, TDB8150, TDB8155, TDB8159 for TDW, and RBF2010, RBF2020, RBF2030, RBF2040 at RBCDI, each of which qualify for separate CDIC coverage.
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
- Peculiar_Investor
- Administrator
- Posts: 13271
- Joined: 01 Mar 2005 14:52
- Location: Calgary
- Contact:
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
A follow-up to Bylo's post, more information from our wiki, High-interest savings accounts, which lists the various discount brokerage HISAs and other considerations/options.
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki New editors wanted and welcomed, please help collaborate and improve the wiki.
Normal people… believe that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain’t broke, it doesn’t have enough features yet. – Scott Adams
Normal people… believe that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain’t broke, it doesn’t have enough features yet. – Scott Adams
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
Almost goes without saying you should use any unused TFSA contribution room.
It also may or may not sense to use any unused RRSP contribution room and then HBP (see other thread).
Note also that the CDIC insurance limits apply separately to registered accounts.
It also may or may not sense to use any unused RRSP contribution room and then HBP (see other thread).
Note also that the CDIC insurance limits apply separately to registered accounts.
- strathglass
- Contributor
- Posts: 357
- Joined: 15 Jan 2008 16:07
- Location: Ottawa, ON
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
Lots of great info from everyone ... thanks.
Bottom line: forgot that CDIC insurance "resets" across accounts - RRSP vs. non-registered; single vs. joint accounts.
And I didn't realize there were so many options at any one institution.
So it looks like it is not such a big issue to deal with!
Bottom line: forgot that CDIC insurance "resets" across accounts - RRSP vs. non-registered; single vs. joint accounts.
And I didn't realize there were so many options at any one institution.
So it looks like it is not such a big issue to deal with!
* - Strathglass - *
-
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 4523
- Joined: 06 Mar 2014 12:52
- Location: Retired Gen Xer somewhere on the planet earth
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
If an individual had $1m in stock in a single non-reg brokerage account, what is the best way to get CDIC insurance coverage for all of it? Would I create 10 non-reg brokerage accounts with other institutions and transfer stock in-kind?
That seems like a PITA.
That seems like a PITA.
- strathglass
- Contributor
- Posts: 357
- Joined: 15 Jan 2008 16:07
- Location: Ottawa, ON
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
CDIC doesn't cover stocks.Flaccidsteele wrote:If an individual had $1m in stock in a single non-reg brokerage account, what is the best way to get CDIC insurance coverage for all of it? Would I create 10 non-reg brokerage accounts with other institutions and transfer stock in-kind?
That seems like a PITA.
From the CDIC web site:
CDIC insures most — but not all — savings.
...
Accounts and products NOT insured by CDIC:
mutual funds and stocks
GICs and other term deposits with a date to maturity of more than 5 years
bonds
Treasury bills
CDIC does NOT insure any accounts or products in U.S. dollars or other foreign currency.
CDIC does NOT insure any accounts or products held in banks or other institutions that are NOT CDIC members.
* - Strathglass - *
- Bylo Selhi
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 29494
- Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
- Location: Waterloo, ON
- Contact:
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
First, as strathglass stated, this isn't a CDIC insured account.Flaccidsteele wrote:If an individual had $1m in stock in a single non-reg brokerage account
Most if not all Canadian brokers are members of Canadian Investor Protection Fund (CIPF) and offer $1M insurance "if you suffer a financial loss because the Member cannot return the property in your account to you. Such financial loss must be caused by the insolvency of the Member." Such a situation might arise if the broker becomes a victim of employee malfeasance or a major hacking where assets are stolen, the broker is unable to make clients whole and thus declares bankruptcy.
N.B. This coverage does not apply to the stocks held by the brokerage on your behalf, e.g. if you own $1M of BCE and they go bust.
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
-
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 4523
- Joined: 06 Mar 2014 12:52
- Location: Retired Gen Xer somewhere on the planet earth
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
Thanks strathglass and Bylo. Just two more questions:
1. With regards to CIPF insurance, you mention that Canadian brokers are members of the CIPF and offer $1m insurance. Does this mean that I need to ask for the insurance or do I have it because I opened up the non-reg account?
2. Also if the non-reg account is over $1m, say $2m, to get CIPF insurance I would just have to split the stock in-kind between two Canadian brokers who are members of the CIPF?
I apologize for taking this thread OT. Thanks again. Much appreciated.
1. With regards to CIPF insurance, you mention that Canadian brokers are members of the CIPF and offer $1m insurance. Does this mean that I need to ask for the insurance or do I have it because I opened up the non-reg account?
2. Also if the non-reg account is over $1m, say $2m, to get CIPF insurance I would just have to split the stock in-kind between two Canadian brokers who are members of the CIPF?
I apologize for taking this thread OT. Thanks again. Much appreciated.
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
1. It is automatic much like CDIC would be for a bank account.
2. The $1 million CIPF is based on aggregate market value of securities in the account. It would be a matter of distributing assets across enough brokers to keep each account value under $1 million. I would be surprised if many investors actually split up accounts specifically for that reason, especially if with the big 5 or 6 big bank brokerages.
2. The $1 million CIPF is based on aggregate market value of securities in the account. It would be a matter of distributing assets across enough brokers to keep each account value under $1 million. I would be surprised if many investors actually split up accounts specifically for that reason, especially if with the big 5 or 6 big bank brokerages.
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki The go-to place to bolster your financial freedom
-
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 4523
- Joined: 06 Mar 2014 12:52
- Location: Retired Gen Xer somewhere on the planet earth
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
Because the risk is low or because it's a PITA or both? Or something else?AltaRed wrote:I would be surprised if many investors actually split up accounts specifically for that reason, especially if with the big 5 or 6 big bank brokerages.
- Bylo Selhi
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 29494
- Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
- Location: Waterloo, ON
- Contact:
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
Two questions:AltaRed wrote:I would be surprised if many investors actually split up accounts specifically for that reason, especially if with the big 5 or 6 big bank brokerages.
1. [on the off-topic] If the brokerage subsidiary of a Big Bank were to become insolvent, what legal obligation would their owner have to bail them out? (They would have a "moral" obligation and Ottawa might have to apply some "moral suasion", etc. but that's a separate matter.) Would the owning bank's assets be at risk?
2. [back on the original topic] There are lots of posts and even entire threads on CDIC coverage and on how to game that $100k limit. I can understand going to all this effort if one has large deposits at small institutions like Peoples Trust. But how likely is a Big Bank going to be unable to repay depositors? And how likely is Ottawa going to stand by idly as the CDIC fund gets depleted without stepping in? If the auto industry is so vital to the economy that a "conservative" government stepped in to bail it out, is it at all conceivable that Ottawa would let a Big Bank fail? And if things were so bad (asteroid strikes the planet, nuclear war, aliens decide to run a worm hole in our neighbourhood, etc.) that they couldn't, does anyone think the loss of $100k, or even $1M, would be anywhere near the top of their priority list?
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
Your second response helps answer the first. While I agree there may not be any legal obligation, if the discount brokerage of any of the big 5 banks went insolvent, it would be a reputational disaster for the big bank to let it fail. I see CIPF protection as being primarily protection against fraud and similar shenanigans.
I suspect those with tens of millions in financial assets do not try to spread their worth across several brokerages. Since there are members here with $3+ million in financial assets, I wonder what they do.....
I suspect those with tens of millions in financial assets do not try to spread their worth across several brokerages. Since there are members here with $3+ million in financial assets, I wonder what they do.....
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki The go-to place to bolster your financial freedom
- parvus
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 10014
- Joined: 20 Feb 2005 16:09
- Location: Waiting for the real estate meltdown on Rua Açores.
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
CIPF only ensures your accounts are safe against the brokerage using them as collateral for its own endeavours or capital requirements. On the one hand, if the brokerage goes bankrupt, but has kept fully segregated accounts, it ought to be easy to transfer those accounts to another institution -- as happened with the life policies and annuities bought by other lifecos after the provincial overstretch of Confederation Life.Bylo Selhi wrote:Two questions:AltaRed wrote:I would be surprised if many investors actually split up accounts specifically for that reason, especially if with the big 5 or 6 big bank brokerages.
1. [on the off-topic] If the brokerage subsidiary of a Big Bank were to become insolvent, what legal obligation would their owner have to bail them out? (They would have a "moral" obligation and Ottawa might have to apply some "moral suasion", etc. but that's a separate matter.) Would the owning bank's assets be at risk?
On the other hand, if client accounts and capital accounts are mingled -- and they're not supposed to be, but securities regulators are less an Argus than a Johnny-come-lately -- it can take years to settle the estate.
Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen — a wit
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki Your go-to guide for financial basics
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki Your go-to guide for financial basics
- Bylo Selhi
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 29494
- Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
- Location: Waterloo, ON
- Contact:
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
Yes of course. I'd assumed that client assets are [supposed to be] segregated. The situation I'm concerned with is insolvency as the result of management incompetence, employee malfeasance and the like where that turns out not to be the case.parvus wrote:CIPF only ensures your accounts are safe against the brokerage using them as collateral for its own endeavours or capital requirements. On the one hand, if the brokerage goes bankrupt, but has kept fully segregated accounts, it ought to be easy to transfer those accounts to another institution -- as happened with the life policies and annuities bought by other lifecos after the provincial overstretch of Confederation Life.
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
- parvus
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 10014
- Joined: 20 Feb 2005 16:09
- Location: Waiting for the real estate meltdown on Rua Açores.
Re: House Hiatus ... where to park a large sum temporarily?
There were a few such bucket-shop "broker-dealer" cases in Canada in the late 1990s, until the securities commissions delisted the designation and forced everyone to become IDA (now IIRCOC) members, as investment dealers, and thus forced to contribute to CIPF. By then, the bucket shops had gone out of business -- or into bankruptcy.
<digression>
The Wolf of Wall Street, like Boiler Room before it, is about bucket shops, not the chicanery that may happen in the capital markets divisions of the investment banks. </digression>
Not that I'm sanguine about regulation. Unregistered boiler rooms turn up all the time -- and there's no protection there, since as non-registrants, they were never part of CIPF in the first place.
To answer the question about the banks, undoubtedly they would find the money secure the capital ratios of their investment-dealer subsidiaries. That said, not a few mutual fund dealers have gone under (without client loss) thanks to inadequate capital.
<digression>
The Wolf of Wall Street, like Boiler Room before it, is about bucket shops, not the chicanery that may happen in the capital markets divisions of the investment banks. </digression>
Not that I'm sanguine about regulation. Unregistered boiler rooms turn up all the time -- and there's no protection there, since as non-registrants, they were never part of CIPF in the first place.
To answer the question about the banks, undoubtedly they would find the money secure the capital ratios of their investment-dealer subsidiaries. That said, not a few mutual fund dealers have gone under (without client loss) thanks to inadequate capital.
Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen — a wit
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki Your go-to guide for financial basics
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki Your go-to guide for financial basics