Royal Bank (Symbol-RY)

Discuss your favourite picks, broker, and trading or investment style.
User avatar
Pickles
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 4215
Joined: 27 Sep 2006 09:44
Location: Toronto

Post by Pickles »

Mike Schimek wrote:Bought more ravioli today, didn't have to cost average or anything.

Waiting for the inevitable price jump. I'm counting on a 10-15% annual appreciation rate.
Well at least if you have to eat your words, it'll be delicious!
Regards,
Pickles
scampbell
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 154
Joined: 15 Apr 2007 12:27
Location: Victoria, B.C.

Post by scampbell »

Interesting...on MarketCall last night, Bruce Campbell said that "In the last 24 months RY has become 7th largest bank in the world, used to be 50th two years ago". They're all slipping and sliding down, RY apparently sliding slower than some.
User avatar
Peculiar_Investor
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 13267
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 14:52
Location: Calgary
Contact:

Post by Peculiar_Investor »

scampbell wrote:Interesting...on MarketCall last night, Bruce Campbell said that "In the last 24 months RY has become 7th largest bank in the world, used to be 50th two years ago". They're all slipping and sliding down, RY apparently sliding slower than some.
The print edition of today's Globe and Mail, page B12 has a neat graphic showing the changes in sizes of various banks worldwide. Unfortunately I haven't been able to find the graphic on-line. The article can be found at As global banks crash and burn, Canada's sink to 'astonishing' value
Imagefiniki, the Canadian financial wiki New editors wanted and welcomed, please help collaborate and improve the wiki.

Normal people… believe that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain’t broke, it doesn’t have enough features yet. – Scott Adams
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 29494
Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
Location: Waterloo, ON
Contact:

Post by Bylo Selhi »

In the last 24 months RY has become 7th largest bank in the world, used to be 50th two years ago.
Recall that the pretext for the attempted bank mergers a decade ago was to allow Canadian banks to have enough financial heft to compete globally. It seems Paul Martin turned out (yet again) to be right in Nix[on]ing RY's grand pretensions, even if he did it for different reasons :lol:

(Yes, I know it was Cleghorn, not Nixon, but that wouldn't sound as good.)
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
User avatar
kcowan
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 16033
Joined: 18 Apr 2006 20:33
Location: Pacific latitude 20/49

Post by kcowan »

Being right for the wrong reasons is OK in my books!

(I am sure there was another agenda at work at the time. But then I admit I am paranoid and always expect politicians to act in their own self interest.)
For the fun of it...Keith
User avatar
investor99
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 1003
Joined: 22 Nov 2006 20:53
Location: Brantford, Ontario
Contact:

Dripping at a Discount

Post by investor99 »

Not a dividend hike but a benefit to those who DRIP Royal Bank.

At this time, the bank has decided to issue shares from treasury at a three per cent discount from the average market price until such time as the bank elects otherwise. Most recently the common shares purchased under the plan have been issued from treasury with no discount to the average market price. These changes will be effective starting with the dividend, payable on May 22, 2009 to common and preferred shareholders of record on April 23, 2009.

Shareholders who currently participate in the plan and who will continue to do so will automatically have the discount applied to the reinvestment of their dividends on the May 22, 2009 payment date.
The best time to plant an Oak tree was twenty five years ago. The second best time is now.
--
http://themoneygardener.com/
Taggart
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 6893
Joined: 05 Dec 2005 07:34

Post by Taggart »

RBC logs $1.05-billion profit

Thursday, February 26, 2009
User avatar
AltaRed
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 33398
Joined: 05 Mar 2005 20:04
Location: Ogopogo Land

Post by AltaRed »

investor99 wrote:Not a dividend hike but a benefit to those who DRIP Royal Bank.
A benefit to the Royal as well, as shareholder incentive to keep capital inside the company.
User avatar
Shakespeare
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 23396
Joined: 15 Feb 2005 23:25
Location: Calgary, AB

Post by Shakespeare »

For RY, it gives them low-cost capital, since they are issuing treasury shares. 3% is less than the underwriters charge. It is, however, dilutive.
Sic transit gloria mundi. Tuesday is usually worse. - Robert A. Heinlein, Starman Jones
lystgl
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 1642
Joined: 06 Apr 2006 17:44
Location: Alberta

Post by lystgl »

Shakespeare wrote:For RY, it gives them low-cost capital, since they are issuing treasury shares. 3% is less than the underwriters charge. It is, however, dilutive.
Hope it's not desperate!
User avatar
deaddog
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 3422
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 19:59
Location: Central BC/Arizona

Post by deaddog »

I'm surprised that companies aren't issueing stock dividends
NOVICE99
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 444
Joined: 03 Dec 2005 21:45

Post by NOVICE99 »

Sitting over $43 today. Should I sell? Seems like analyst estimates not too optimistic?
User avatar
Springbok
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 5438
Joined: 22 Mar 2005 16:47

Post by Springbok »

Shakespeare wrote:For RY, it gives them low-cost capital, since they are issuing treasury shares. 3% is less than the underwriters charge. It is, however, dilutive.
Seems to me they are trying to encourage more current shareholders to drip their dividends. This would reduce the cash flow required to pay dividends.

This move perhaps indicates that they would have a cash flow problem if they are to maintain current dividends. They may not be alone.
User avatar
scomac
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 7788
Joined: 19 Feb 2005 09:47
Location: The Gateway to Wine Country

Post by scomac »

NOVICE99 wrote:Sitting over $43 today. Should I sell? Seems like analyst estimates not too optimistic?
Did you notice the big jump in bank shares yesterday? Many pundits feel that was a direct result of this analyst's upgrade. If you favour analysts' opinions, the advice has changed to accumulate on weakness from sell into strength.

What it comes down to is your opinion on the prospects of banks and the economy in general. If you are really bearish, feel that the banks' future prospects are not particularly strong and that we haven't yet seen the worst of the impact of the credit crisis, then considering the size of the move off of the bottom (if it is the bottom), it is probably a good idea to take some money off of the table. Conversely, if you feel that the prospects for the banks are no worse than what is being priced in and quite possibly better, then you are being paid pretty well to wait and see how this all unfolds. That's not to suggest that the banks won't sell-off quite a bit going forward depending on the mood of the markets; either way, it's a risk. No one can tell you whether you should be buying or selling. That's something that you have to decide for yourself.
"On what principle is it, that when we see nothing but improvement behind us, we are to expect nothing but deterioration before us?"
Thomas Babington Macaulay in 1830
User avatar
Nemo2
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 9670
Joined: 02 Jan 2006 14:27
Location: Belleville

Post by Nemo2 »

We listened to Scott, (again), used his thoughts as a catalyst to act on our own musings, and sold our small RY holding @ $43.76, (paid $26.29 for them back in February).
Exit, pursued by a bear.
William Shakespeare, Stage direction in "The Winter's Tale"
User avatar
scomac
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 7788
Joined: 19 Feb 2005 09:47
Location: The Gateway to Wine Country

Post by scomac »

Nemo2 wrote:We listened to Scott, (again), used his thoughts as a catalyst to act on our own musings, and sold our small RY holding @ $43.76, (paid $26.29 for them back in February).
Well that's good then. I had hoped to provide a balanced perspective. Considering we reached different conclusions would seem to confirm that I was successful. :wink:
"On what principle is it, that when we see nothing but improvement behind us, we are to expect nothing but deterioration before us?"
Thomas Babington Macaulay in 1830
User avatar
Nemo2
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 9670
Joined: 02 Jan 2006 14:27
Location: Belleville

Post by Nemo2 »

scomac wrote:
Nemo2 wrote:We listened to Scott, (again), used his thoughts as a catalyst to act on our own musings, and sold our small RY holding @ $43.76, (paid $26.29 for them back in February).
Well that's good then. I had hoped to provide a balanced perspective. Considering we reached different conclusions would seem to confirm that I was successful. :wink:
In hindsight, (since they're up about another 26¢ since we sold them), we should've offered them for more, but we'd earlier contemplated 'banking' the profit and your comments spurred us to action.

Now.......(as with TRP which we just repurchased for less than we sold), if there's a hiccup, we'll just buy the RY back. :)
Exit, pursued by a bear.
William Shakespeare, Stage direction in "The Winter's Tale"
DUKE
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 50
Joined: 28 Apr 2006 17:59

Re: Royal Bank (Symbol-RY)

Post by DUKE »

RY seems to have taken a bigger beating over the past 2 months than either BMO or BNS. Ideas why?
User avatar
scomac
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 7788
Joined: 19 Feb 2005 09:47
Location: The Gateway to Wine Country

Re: Royal Bank (Symbol-RY)

Post by scomac »

DUKE wrote:RY seems to have taken a bigger beating over the past 2 months than either BMO or BNS. Ideas why?
They missed street expectations and they were priced for perfection. :roll:
"On what principle is it, that when we see nothing but improvement behind us, we are to expect nothing but deterioration before us?"
Thomas Babington Macaulay in 1830
User avatar
scomac
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 7788
Joined: 19 Feb 2005 09:47
Location: The Gateway to Wine Country

Re: Royal Bank (Symbol-RY)

Post by scomac »

Any bets on the size of the drop on the open this morning? I'll place the over/under at -5% and wager over! :shock:
"On what principle is it, that when we see nothing but improvement behind us, we are to expect nothing but deterioration before us?"
Thomas Babington Macaulay in 1830
User avatar
deaddog
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 3422
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 19:59
Location: Central BC/Arizona

Re: Royal Bank (Symbol-RY)

Post by deaddog »

down a buck in pre market
"And the days that I keep my gratitude higher than my expectations, well, I have really good days" RW Hubbard
User avatar
scomac
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 7788
Joined: 19 Feb 2005 09:47
Location: The Gateway to Wine Country

Re: Royal Bank (Symbol-RY)

Post by scomac »

scomac wrote:Any bets on the size of the drop on the open this morning? I'll place the over/under at -5% and wager over! :shock:
Hmmm...not nearly as bad as I thought. I guess the sell-off on Tuesday looked after part of it. So much for crystal ball gazing... :roll:
"On what principle is it, that when we see nothing but improvement behind us, we are to expect nothing but deterioration before us?"
Thomas Babington Macaulay in 1830
User avatar
Shakespeare
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 23396
Joined: 15 Feb 2005 23:25
Location: Calgary, AB

Re: Royal Bank (Symbol-RY)

Post by Shakespeare »

Well, even though banks remain my largest sector at 10.6% and RY is my second largest holding after BNS, I'm pleased that the extra diversification I've worked on over the past year has rendered the portfolio less susceptible to problems with financials. Very little portfolio change overall at this little blip.
Sic transit gloria mundi. Tuesday is usually worse. - Robert A. Heinlein, Starman Jones
tasamy
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 23
Joined: 30 Sep 2009 11:20
Location: toronto

Re: Royal Bank (Symbol-RY)

Post by tasamy »

RY is @ $52.09 so nearly at the bottom (52-low is $48.85), and 3.56% dividend; Is that a good entry point (buy low sell high) or it is better to stay away? Feeback is appreciated!
User avatar
patriot1
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 4883
Joined: 28 Feb 2005 03:53

Re: Royal Bank (Symbol-RY)

Post by patriot1 »

RY got down to $22.79 in Jan 2009. That's what I call a "low". A dividend yield of 3.58% for a bank is more like what I call a "high".

I think earnings of all the banks are vulnerable going forward, I think that's pretty clear given our massive consumer debt. Reduced lending at best and defaults at worst.
Post Reply