Capital loss carry forward
Capital loss carry forward
Say that I did some tax loss harvesting in 2016 and ended the year with a total loss of $20000 of which 50% is taxable for a carry forward amount of ($10000). I assume that if the inclusion rate changes to a higher rate in the future, that one does not get to go back and adjust the amount of the loss carried forward? And if that is true, does it make some sense to harvest some gains now to "use up" that loss before any rate change occurs?
-
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 3954
- Joined: 10 Sep 2012 17:26
- Location: QC
Re: Capital loss carry forward
Usually, the tax calculations are adapted for taking into account the year of the loss, to keep the system fair. As an example, look at the rules for applying losses after 1989 and before 2000 in this CRA document: http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tx/ndvdls/tpcs ... f-eng.htmlgaspr wrote: ↑04 May 2017 17:29 Say that I did some tax loss harvesting in 2016 and ended the year with a total loss of $20000 of which 50% is taxable for a carry forward amount of ($10000). I assume that if the inclusion rate changes to a higher rate in the future, that one does not get to go back and adjust the amount of the loss carried forward? And if that is true, does it make some sense to harvest some gains now to "use up" that loss before any rate change occurs?
The bigger problem of carrying losses forward is that the inflation-adjusted value of the loss erodes with time. It is, in general, a bad idea to let losses carry forward; it is better to immediately realize offsetting gains (keeping tax down to $0), when possible. Of course, this could be invalidated by a change in future inclusion rate. Take your bet!
Variable Percentage Withdrawal (finiki.org/wiki/VPW) | One-Fund Portfolio (VBAL in all accounts)
Re: Capital loss carry forward
Also see http://www.taxtips.ca/filing/capitallosses.htm for how historical inclusion rates have been handled.
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki The go-to place to bolster your financial freedom
Re: Capital loss carry forward
Thank you!
-
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 3378
- Joined: 27 May 2008 16:25
Re: Capital loss carry forward
I have a reasonably sized loss dating back to the days when my parents managed an account for me. It just so happens though that my RRSP/TFSA room grew faster than my income so I've had years and years without non-reg capital gains and the loss has just kept being carried forward.longinvest wrote: ↑04 May 2017 18:01 The bigger problem of carrying losses forward is that the inflation-adjusted value of the loss erodes with time. It is, in general, a bad idea to let losses carry forward; it is better to immediately realize offsetting gains (keeping tax down to $0), when possible. Of course, this could be invalidated by a change in future inclusion rate. Take your bet!
However at my current income and savings rate, in a year or two I'll start needing that non-reg account again.
Re: Capital loss carry forward
To me, only if it makes sense to crystallize gains, e.g. an outsized position. Taking gains just to offset a current year loss doesn't make sense. What can make sense depending on one's MTR in a particular prior year is to carryback a loss to offset gains in one of the previous 3 tax years with a T1-ADJ.longinvest wrote: ↑04 May 2017 18:01 The bigger problem of carrying losses forward is that the inflation-adjusted value of the loss erodes with time. It is, in general, a bad idea to let losses carry forward; it is better to immediately realize offsetting gains (keeping tax down to $0), when possible.
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki The go-to place to bolster your financial freedom
Re: Capital loss carry forward
I respectfully disagree. I would not recommend realizing offsetting gains just for the sake of neutralizing the loss and not carrying it forward. Of course, it's different when you have another reason to sell/switch a winning position.longinvest wrote: ↑04 May 2017 18:01 The bigger problem of carrying losses forward is that the inflation-adjusted value of the loss erodes with time. It is, in general, a bad idea to let losses carry forward; it is better to immediately realize offsetting gains (keeping tax down to $0), when possible.
So far, whenever the inclusion rate has changed, past capital losses have been adjusted in a fair manner.longinvest wrote: ↑04 May 2017 18:01 Of course, this could be invalidated by a change in future inclusion rate. Take your bet!
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki
“It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.” [Richard P. Feynman, Nobel prize winner]
“It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.” [Richard P. Feynman, Nobel prize winner]
Re: Capital loss carry forward
ISTM that the (slowly eroding) loss in question morally belongs to your parents. Not saying you should pass back the benefit when you will have offsetting gains (I'm pretty sure they won't accept anything), just saying that it's their "property" being eroded by inflation.queerasmoi wrote: ↑06 May 2017 13:53 I have a reasonably sized loss dating back to the days when my parents managed an account for me. It just so happens though that my RRSP/TFSA room grew faster than my income so I've had years and years without non-reg capital gains and the loss has just kept being carried forward.
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki
“It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.” [Richard P. Feynman, Nobel prize winner]
“It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.” [Richard P. Feynman, Nobel prize winner]
Re: Capital loss carry forward
adrian2 wrote: ↑06 May 2017 16:25I respectfully disagree. I would not recommend realizing offsetting gains just for the sake of neutralizing the loss and not carrying it forward. Of course, it's different when you have another reason to sell/switch a winning position.longinvest wrote: ↑04 May 2017 18:01 The bigger problem of carrying losses forward is that the inflation-adjusted value of the loss erodes with time. It is, in general, a bad idea to let losses carry forward; it is better to immediately realize offsetting gains (keeping tax down to $0), when possible.
What if I were to sell all my position In VCN and then immediately purchase ZCN with the proceeds? This would be more than enough of a capital gain to offset the loss. Meets the CRA requirements re superficial losses, and only costs me two trades.
Re: Capital loss carry forward
Again, I think it's a bad idea.gaspr wrote: ↑06 May 2017 17:28What if I were to sell all my position In VCN and then immediately purchase ZCN with the proceeds? This would be more than enough of a capital gain to offset the loss. Meets the CRA requirements re superficial losses, and only costs me two trades.adrian2 wrote: ↑06 May 2017 16:25I respectfully disagree. I would not recommend realizing offsetting gains just for the sake of neutralizing the loss and not carrying it forward. Of course, it's different when you have another reason to sell/switch a winning position.longinvest wrote: ↑04 May 2017 18:01 The bigger problem of carrying losses forward is that the inflation-adjusted value of the loss erodes with time. It is, in general, a bad idea to let losses carry forward; it is better to immediately realize offsetting gains (keeping tax down to $0), when possible.
If the inclusion rate increases, carry forward capital losses will likely be increased from their original values.
I see absolutely no reason to "burn" any losses with "artificial" gains just in order to avoid the carry forward.
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki
“It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.” [Richard P. Feynman, Nobel prize winner]
“It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.” [Richard P. Feynman, Nobel prize winner]
Re: Capital loss carry forward
If I had a gain from one of the past three years, and it was a year with a higher than normal marginal rate, then it might make sense? But in my actual case, that is not an option.
Re: Capital loss carry forward
If you had a gain in the past 3 years it would make perfect sense to carry back; I think we all agree on that.
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki
“It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.” [Richard P. Feynman, Nobel prize winner]
“It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.” [Richard P. Feynman, Nobel prize winner]
Re: Capital loss carry forward
So if the loss carried forward is eroding to inflation, then so is any unrealized capital gain. And at the exact same rate so the argument re inflation is not a valid one. Am I getting this right?
-
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 3954
- Joined: 10 Sep 2012 17:26
- Location: QC
Re: Capital loss carry forward
No, you're not.
If tax brackets were not indexed to inflation, it would make no difference. But, as they are indexed to inflation, one is better to offset gains as early as possible. Offsetting gains going back three years with losses experienced this year is best. Offsetting gains in the future with losses experienced this year is worse.
Does it make a big difference, in a 2% inflation world? It depends how long the losses are carried. If one waits 25 years, it's a loss of almost 40% in value.
OK, look at it this way:
- Would you rather pay $10 in taxes today, or $10 in taxes in 25 years?
- Would you rather get a $10 tax rebate today, or a $10 tax rebate in 25 years?
Last edited by longinvest on 06 May 2017 19:39, edited 2 times in total.
Variable Percentage Withdrawal (finiki.org/wiki/VPW) | One-Fund Portfolio (VBAL in all accounts)
Re: Capital loss carry forward
FWIW, I've rarely had a carryforward loss, the primary exception being 2008/2009 when I purposely crystallized losses and I think it took until 2013 to use them up completely. Could not pass on the opportunity. Five years is neither here nor there.
Last edited by AltaRed on 06 May 2017 18:54, edited 1 time in total.
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki The go-to place to bolster your financial freedom
-
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 3954
- Joined: 10 Sep 2012 17:26
- Location: QC
Re: Capital loss carry forward
It's no surprise that the CRA limits us to carry losses back no more than 3 years, but allows us to indefinitely carry them forward. It also allows us to indefinitely carry forward RRSP deductions.
Variable Percentage Withdrawal (finiki.org/wiki/VPW) | One-Fund Portfolio (VBAL in all accounts)
Re: Capital loss carry forward
I agree with adrian2adrian2 wrote: ↑06 May 2017 16:25I respectfully disagree. I would not recommend realizing offsetting gains just for the sake of neutralizing the loss and not carrying it forward. Of course, it's different when you have another reason to sell/switch a winning position.longinvest wrote: ↑04 May 2017 18:01 The bigger problem of carrying losses forward is that the inflation-adjusted value of the loss erodes with time. It is, in general, a bad idea to let losses carry forward; it is better to immediately realize offsetting gains (keeping tax down to $0), when possible.
I have always been slow on the trigger for my winners. For this reason, I frequently have positions in excess of 5% of total portfolio. Whenever I sell a loser, I tend to sell one of my outsized winners to take immediate advantage of doing this without any tax consequences. The proceeds of both sales are lumped together and used to initiate a new position and hence increase diversification.
One other advantage of coinciding a CG with a Capital loss in the same year is that the Capital loss will permit you to not lose some of the income tested benefits (OAS, family allowance...) This advantage is lost if the loss is carried forward.
"The term is over: the holidays have begun. The dream is ended: this is the morning."-C.S.Lewis, The Last Battle
Re: Capital loss carry forward
Except cap losses in any given year must first be used to offset cap gains in the current year, so that decision is already made for the current year. All one can do is trigger yet more cap gains to use up more of the cap losses and why do that if you would not otherwise crystallize the gains?
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki The go-to place to bolster your financial freedom
-
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 4208
- Joined: 24 Jan 2014 23:17
Re: Capital loss carry forward
If you were selling VCN for a gain you would be free to repurchase it right away - you wouldn't have to buy ZCN instead (you have a gain not a superficial loss). You would presumably be increasing your ACB of VCN though (and reducing its future capital gains).
I did this last year to take gains to offset a loss and then gift the proceeds, but I don't think you will find people recommending you do this just for the sake of offsetting the loss if your intent is holding long term.
Re: Capital loss carry forward
Ah yes. Good point.OnlyMyOpinion wrote: ↑06 May 2017 19:56If you were selling VCN for a gain you would be free to repurchase it right away - you wouldn't have to buy ZCN instead (you have a gain not a superficial loss). You would be increasing your ACB of VCN though (and presumably reducing its future capital gains).
I did this last year to take gains to offset a loss and then gift the full proceeds, but I don't think you will find people recommending you do this just for the sake of offsetting the loss if your intent is holding long term.
Re: Capital loss carry forward
Sorry if I am being a little slow here but....longinvest wrote: ↑06 May 2017 18:33No, you're not.
If tax brackets were not indexed to inflation, it would make no difference. But, as they are indexed to inflation, one is better to offset gains as early as possible. Offsetting gains going back three years with losses experienced this year is best. Offsetting gains in the future with losses experienced this year is worse.
Does it make a big difference, in a 2% inflation world? It depends how long the losses are carried. If one waits 25 years, it's a loss of almost 40% in value.
OK, look at it this way:(Answers: a) in 25 years b) today)
- Would you rather pay $10 in taxes today, or $10 in taxes in 25 years?
- Would you rather get a $10 tax rebate today, or a $10 tax rebate in 25 years?
Say I currently have a $20k loss carried forward. I also have a $20k unrealized gain. Both values erode to inflation. Why would it matter when the offsetting gain is realized as it would have zero effect on income?
-
- Veteran Contributor
- Posts: 3954
- Joined: 10 Sep 2012 17:26
- Location: QC
Re: Capital loss carry forward
OK, I might be wrong. Paying $0 today or in 25 years is identical. Right. So, all that remains is to speculate on whether the inclusion rate might increase or decrease in the future. If one thinks that an increase is more likely than a decrease, one would prefer to trigger the offsetting gain early.
A lazy investor who does not try to speculate on future tax changes would not artificially trigger offsetting gains. Adrian wins. (Time to fix my IPS ).
Last edited by longinvest on 06 May 2017 21:00, edited 13 times in total.
Variable Percentage Withdrawal (finiki.org/wiki/VPW) | One-Fund Portfolio (VBAL in all accounts)
Re: Capital loss carry forward
I am saying that I have a reason to crystallize a capital gain. The reason is to reduce a overweight position. You will add that the tax tail should not wag the investment dog. I am saying that I do not mind (too much) letting a position drift up to 8-9% (as an example...) but if I can bring it down without tax issues (since I have a capital loss in that year), I will bring it down.AltaRed wrote: ↑06 May 2017 19:52 Except cap losses in any given year must first be used to offset cap gains in the current year, so that decision is already made for the current year. All one can do is trigger yet more cap gains to use up more of the cap losses and why do that if you would not otherwise crystallize the gains?
The bonus is that triggering the CG in that year (rather than a future year and carrying forward the Capital loss) is that the CG trigger will not (in my case) reduce my family allowance.
"The term is over: the holidays have begun. The dream is ended: this is the morning."-C.S.Lewis, The Last Battle
Re: Capital loss carry forward
Sounds logical to me. I tend to play with crystallizing tax losses to time them appropriately. For instance, I decided to rotate some reset prefs in 2016 as they were climbing to grab the tax losses before they diminished in value. Now I have some losses to play with, maybe to offset some gains this year if/when I dump ALA (after they close that ill fated acquisition in the USA).
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki The go-to place to bolster your financial freedom
Re: Capital loss carry forward
I still think that changing the CG inclusion rate is a red herring. In the past, whenever such changes have occurred, existing (carry-forward) capital losses have been adjusted in a fair manner. Why would you think this would not be the case in the future?longinvest wrote: ↑06 May 2017 20:34 OK, I might be wrong. Paying $0 today or in 25 years is identical. Right. So, all that remains is to speculate on whether the inclusion rate might increase or decrease in the future. If one thinks that an increase is more likely than a decrease, one would prefer to trigger the offsetting gain early.
A lazy investor who does not try to speculate on future tax changes would not artificially trigger offsetting gains. Adrian wins. (Time to fix my IPS ).
finiki, the Canadian financial wiki
“It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.” [Richard P. Feynman, Nobel prize winner]
“It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.” [Richard P. Feynman, Nobel prize winner]