10 Questions for John Bogle

Recommended reading, economic debates, predictions and opinions.
WishingWealth
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 6701
Joined: 27 Feb 2005 10:53

Post by WishingWealth »

He (Bogle) must be fed up answering all those questions.
At MarketWatch: http://tinyurl.com/67ubhs
Stick to the plan
Commentary: Vanguard founder Bogle urges simple approach to investing
...
As such, he issued a warning:
"If the consequences are that one more drop in the stock market is going to wipe you out, you must get out of the stock market," Bogle said. "I don't recommend it, but if that's what happens and the consequences to you are that dire, what am I supposed to say, 'Stay in and accept my probabilities?' Not me, pal."
But his message to investors was clear: If you didn't have the foresight to see this decline coming, waiting to the point of maximum pain to bail out is simply proving his point that investors need to be ready to commit to the stock market with "no peeking."
Not looking at a portfolio's swings, Bogle said, allows an investor to ignore daily, weekly and monthly fluctuations.
At the time when Bogle changed his asset allocation, his worry wasn't that the stock market would crater -- though it did -- it was that his allocation was inappropriate for his age.
...
WW
User avatar
Peculiar_Investor
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 13271
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 14:52
Location: Calgary
Contact:

Post by Peculiar_Investor »

Not sure if this is the most appropriate placing for this, but it is from John Bogle, Six Lessons for Investors, Be diversified and don't assume past performance will continue.
John C. Bogle wrote:There is almost no limit to the ability of investors to ignore the lessons of the past. This cost them dearly last year. Here are six of the most important of these lessons
You'll have to follow the link to be schooled by John, but it is worth the time spent IMHO.
Imagefiniki, the Canadian financial wiki New editors wanted and welcomed, please help collaborate and improve the wiki.

Normal people… believe that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain’t broke, it doesn’t have enough features yet. – Scott Adams
User avatar
Serdic
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 185
Joined: 25 Nov 2008 21:39
Location: Neither here nor there.

Post by Serdic »

Bogle on Minnesota Public Radio: When enough is enough

50 minute Q&A with Bogle.

edit - or I could have read Bylo's webpage 2 days before I posted this. :P
End Transmission.
WishingWealth
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 6701
Joined: 27 Feb 2005 10:53

Post by WishingWealth »

I came across those Bogle articles while looking for something else.

pdf in Financial Analysts Journal

Markets in Crisis
http://tinyurl.com/bc87xu

and

Black Monday and Black Swans
http://www.cfapubs.org/doi/pdf/10.2469/faj.v64.n2.9

WW
User avatar
adrian2
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 13333
Joined: 19 Feb 2005 08:42
Location: Greater Toronto Area

Post by adrian2 »

Via prefblog, a debatable idea from Bogle:
Bloomberg wrote:John Bogle, founder of fund manager Vanguard Group, echoed Miller in his testimony before the committee, saying, “the 401(k) plan is an idea whose time has come” yet “our existing defined contribution system is failing investors” because of high fees, low levels of saving, excess flexibility that permits cashing out and too much borrowing and inappropriate asset allocation. Bogle recommended a single defined contribution plan with annuities from low-cost providers. The single system would be overseen by an independent Federal Retirement Board to protect the interests of plan participants, Bogle said.

Retirement savings are too exposed to market risk, according to Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington and another witness at today’s hearing. Baker proposed a government-managed system that would provide a modest rate of return for employees. He said it would build on Social Security and allow workers a voluntary default contribution of at least 3 percent of their salaries.

Employees must work longer to extend retirement savings and Social Security, which “has shined during this crisis,” could be stabilized and supplemented by target-date funds, said Munnell. Target-date funds shift money into more conservative investments as an investor approaches retirement.
MFlo
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 45
Joined: 05 Feb 2009 15:15

Post by MFlo »

Bogle is no different than other pundits on the boob tube.
User avatar
adrian2
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 13333
Joined: 19 Feb 2005 08:42
Location: Greater Toronto Area

Post by adrian2 »

MFlo wrote:Bogle is no different than other pundits on the boob tube.
Sure, Mr. Handler.
Doug
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 778
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 10:10

Post by Doug »

Investing advice from Jack Bogle:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/....03110.html
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 29494
Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
Location: Waterloo, ON
Contact:

Post by Bylo Selhi »

Doug wrote:Investing advice from Jack Bogle:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/....03110.html
Try this link.

And also from Gus Sauter: Avoid Irrational Exuberance With Alternatives
Gus Sauter is Vanguard Group's chief investment officer. He started at the funds giant in October 1987, two weeks before global markets crashed.

In that environment, Sauter took over as head of Vanguard's quantitative equities group, which at the time consisted of only index mutual funds. Since then, the unit has expanded to include a combination of passive and active quantitative strategies. Six years ago, Sauter assumed the company's CIO duties as well.

On Wednesday, IndexUniverse.com's Managing Editor Murray Coleman caught up with the busy Vanguard executive to discuss current market conditions and trends he's watching such as the upcoming launch of the Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap Index Fund.
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
George$
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 2612
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 20:46
Location: Toronto

Post by George$ »

Gretchen Morgenstern in today's New York Times
He Doesn’t Let Money Managers Off the Hook
EVERY once in a while, if only for sanity’s sake, it is wise to leave our bankrupt era behind and seek out a bit of wisdom from a moral authority. It’s a challenging exercise, given that so many formerly stellar reputations are now shipwrecked and that all those once-smart guys and gals have been reduced to bull-market geniuses.
....
In the face of all this, Mr. Bogle suggests that we force our agents to relearn what being a fiduciary means. A fiduciary, these managers seem to have forgotten, acts for the sole benefit and interest of another. We need to replace the agency society with a fiduciary society, he argues.

And more on Bogle in Business Week
Jack Bogle's Last Crusade?
The mutual fund pioneer is pushing for an overhaul of the retirement-savings system
Bogle's latest mission may be his most ambitious yet: to persuade regulators to overhaul the U.S. retirement-savings system by simplifying account options, clamping down on fees, and making risk more understandable. It also might be his last. Bogle tells BusinessWeek his body has started to reject his 13-year-old transplanted heart. The attack, which began last summer, has landed him in the hospital on four separate occasions. Not that he's looking for sympathy. "I'm not introspective about my health, nor do I live in fear of dying," he says. "Your life expectancy is not enormous when you're 80."
“The search for truth is more precious than its possession.” Albert Einstein
Taggart
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 6893
Joined: 05 Dec 2005 07:34

Post by Taggart »

George posted a link to Bogle above. There is another link from the same source. In it there's a statement that perplexes me, and has for the last couple of days when I first read the article.

Investment Advice from Jack Bogle

In it he states:

"The past century of data show that American businesses have grown at an annual rate of about 9.5%, with 4.5% from dividend yields and the remaining 5% from earnings growth."

-------------------------------------

What puzzles me is where did he get his data from? It looks like nominal returns, but when I look at long term "real returns" from Arnott and also from Dimson, et al, most of the returns calculated show a majority of their returns come from the dividend yield and the re-investment of dividends, while capital gains play a much smaller role. Anyhow, I'm stumped but I'm still working on it.
User avatar
parvus
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 10014
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 16:09
Location: Waiting for the real estate meltdown on Rua Açores.

Post by parvus »

I suspect that he meant "earnings growth" captured by reinvesting the dividends. But it was an abbreviated interview, and so thoughts get abbreviated too.
Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen — a wit
Imagefiniki, the Canadian financial wiki Your go-to guide for financial basics
Image
bender
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 255
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 05:34
Location: BC and beyond

Post by bender »

Is the quote referring to the Gordon equation

return = div + div growth
= div + inflation + real div growth
= 4.5 (historical) + 3 + 2 = 9.5%

Compound away...
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 29494
Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
Location: Waterloo, ON
Contact:

Post by Bylo Selhi »

Jack Bogle's Last Crusade?
Bogle's latest mission may be his most ambitious yet: to persuade regulators to overhaul the U.S. retirement-savings system by simplifying account options, clamping down on fees, and making risk more understandable. It also might be his last. Bogle tells BusinessWeek his body has started to reject his 13-year-old transplanted heart. The attack, which began last summer, has landed him in the hospital on four separate occasions. Not that he's looking for sympathy. "I'm not introspective about my health, nor do I live in fear of dying," he says. "Your life expectancy is not enormous when you're 80."...
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
User avatar
parvus
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 10014
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 16:09
Location: Waiting for the real estate meltdown on Rua Açores.

Post by parvus »

adrian2 wrote:Via prefblog, a debatable idea from Bogle:
Bloomberg wrote:John Bogle, founder of fund manager Vanguard Group, echoed Miller in his testimony before the committee, saying, “the 401(k) plan is an idea whose time has come” yet “our existing defined contribution system is failing investors” because of high fees, low levels of saving, excess flexibility that permits cashing out and too much borrowing and inappropriate asset allocation. Bogle recommended a single defined contribution plan with annuities from low-cost providers. The single system would be overseen by an independent Federal Retirement Board to protect the interests of plan participants, Bogle said.

Retirement savings are too exposed to market risk, according to Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington and another witness at today’s hearing. Baker proposed a government-managed system that would provide a modest rate of return for employees. He said it would build on Social Security and allow workers a voluntary default contribution of at least 3 percent of their salaries.

Employees must work longer to extend retirement savings and Social Security, which “has shined during this crisis,” could be stabilized and supplemented by target-date funds, said Munnell. Target-date funds shift money into more conservative investments as an investor approaches retirement.
Arms-length, opt-out, supplementary pension schemes have, over the past year, rather quickly become the consensus default, it seems.

As has another Bogle take on greed:
A Crisis of Ethic Proportions
We must establish a 'fiduciary society.'
Commerce, business and finance have hardly been exempt from this trend. Relying on Adam Smith's "invisible hand," through which our self-interest advances the interests of society, we have depended on the marketplace and competition to create prosperity and well-being.

But self-interest got out of hand. It created a bottom-line society in which success is measured in monetary terms. Dollars became the coin of the new realm. Unchecked market forces overwhelmed traditional standards of professional conduct, developed over centuries.

The result is a shift from moral absolutism to moral relativism. We've moved from a society in which "there are some things that one simply does not do" to one in which "if everyone else is doing it, I can too." Business ethics and professional standards were lost in the shuffle.

The driving force of any profession includes not only the special knowledge, skills and standards that it demands, but the duty to serve responsibly, selflessly and wisely, and to establish an inherently ethical relationship between professionals and society. The old notion of trusting and being trusted -- which once was not only the accepted standard of business conduct but the key to success -- came to be seen as a quaint relic of an era long gone.

The proximate causes of the crisis are usually said to be easy credit, bankers' cavalier attitudes toward risk, "securitization" (which severed the traditional link between borrower and lender), the extraordinary leverage built into the financial system by complex derivatives, and the failure of our regulators to do their job.

But the larger cause was our failure to recognize the sea change in the nature of capitalism that was occurring right before our eyes. That change was the growth of giant business corporations and giant financial institutions controlled not by their owners in the "ownership society" of yore, but by agents of the owners, which created an "agency society."
Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen — a wit
Imagefiniki, the Canadian financial wiki Your go-to guide for financial basics
Image
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 29494
Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
Location: Waterloo, ON
Contact:

Post by Bylo Selhi »

parvus wrote:
Bloomberg wrote:Bogle recommended a single defined contribution plan with annuities from low-cost providers. The single system would be overseen by an independent Federal Retirement Board to protect the interests of plan participants, Bogle said.
Arms-length, opt-out, supplementary pension schemes have, over the past year, rather quickly become the consensus default, it seems.
I believe Bogle has advocated something like this for many years, largely in reaction to the high fees retail investors otherwise have to pay (except at Vanguard, of course) and their general inability to DIY through thick and thin.
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
User avatar
parvus
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 10014
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 16:09
Location: Waiting for the real estate meltdown on Rua Açores.

Post by parvus »

I listened to a 40-year member of the U.S. actuarial profession this morning talking more about stakeholder conflicts than default 401(k)s. It seems plans offered by large firms are working well enough, but small business and self-employed types don't save enough, so the solution is probably higher payouts from Social Security.

Ah well. Then Ambachtsheer offered his take on a Canada Supplementary Pension Plan.

It amazes me, sometimes, how indecisive some Murricans are. :shock:
Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen — a wit
Imagefiniki, the Canadian financial wiki Your go-to guide for financial basics
Image
DenisD
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 4081
Joined: 19 Feb 2005 01:24
Location: Calgary

Post by DenisD »

Taylor Larimore wrote:Hi Bogleheads:

Our mentor, Jack Bogle, has "updated" his original Common Sense on Mutual Funds written 10 years ago. This is really two books in one: The original book and the updated version with add-on's to his many charts, plus Jack's numerous and often lengthy analysis about his earlier advice; how it has, or has not, held up; and the valuable lessons we can learn.

You can read excerpts from his first bookHERE. The excerpts below, are all new:
http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=46036
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 29494
Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
Location: Waterloo, ON
Contact:

Post by Bylo Selhi »

Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
George$
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 2612
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 20:46
Location: Toronto

Post by George$ »

Bylo Selhi wrote:Attention Christmas shoppers ;) Common Sense on Mutual Funds: Fully Updated 10th Anniversary Edition
I've received my copy from Amazon - now to find time to read it :(

It looks like a fine printing and publication - unlike many pot boiler el cheapos these days - and at 600+ pages quite a bargain (in my view) at the $22.65C price.
“The search for truth is more precious than its possession.” Albert Einstein
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 29494
Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
Location: Waterloo, ON
Contact:

Re: 10 Questions for John Bogle

Post by Bylo Selhi »

Original Sin on Wall Street
What makes a study of history and the Classics so important for business? "It involves critical thinking," Bogle explained. "It involves some kind of perspective, it involves some ability to think 'you know, this has happened before and it could be happening again now.' It would certainly shun the argument that this time is different when the stock market goes to an all-time high...

"Yes," answered Bogle. "And there you have it. Original sin in the financial markets." He paused. "Somebody ought to spend a little time thinking," he said, " and this gets back to the classics, about the role of business in society. It should add value. But the financial business does not add value. By definition the financial business subtracts value. In round numbers, it takes something like $600 billion out of the pockets of investors every year.
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 29494
Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
Location: Waterloo, ON
Contact:

Re: 10 Questions for John Bogle

Post by Bylo Selhi »

Vanguard's Bogle on Bankers, Buffett, Obama
Q: Who makes sense to you on Wall Street? Whom should people be listening to for the next decade?
Bogle: The first two are obvious. Warren Buffett is the pillar of integrity. He does things right. And while he does not index, he believes passionately in indexing and talks about it all the time. And the other is Paul Volcker. Now these are older guys, but they are speaking from positions of total independence and integrity and with no vested interests.

I'm also a great admirer of Bill Gross. He may not always be right, and they tend to take some unusual risks out there. But they have paid off. My hat is off to Bill Gross for the job he's done on fixed-income management.

In the political scene, there is one giant that stands head and shoulders over everyone else and that's our president, Barack Obama. He is trying to rise above the chaotic fray in Washington. We have a stalemate in Washington and not much is going to be done that needs to be done. So can he summon his character, his articulation, his integrity to rise above the political fray in Washington? We will see. But I don't believe he has a rival anywhere who could be president besides him. And I'm a Republican, actually.
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
User avatar
Peculiar_Investor
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 13271
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 14:52
Location: Calgary
Contact:

Re: 10 Questions for John Bogle

Post by Peculiar_Investor »

Imagefiniki, the Canadian financial wiki New editors wanted and welcomed, please help collaborate and improve the wiki.

Normal people… believe that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Engineers believe that if it ain’t broke, it doesn’t have enough features yet. – Scott Adams
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 29494
Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
Location: Waterloo, ON
Contact:

Re: 10 Questions for John Bogle

Post by Bylo Selhi »

The Warrior
Vanguard’s Jack Bogle helped create the American mutual fund industry. Now, in the climactic battle of his life, he’s railing against it — and trying to revolutionize it once and for all.

Jack Bogle could be on a beach somewhere. The 80-year-old founder of mutual fund giant the Vanguard Group could be with his wife, Eve, soaking up the sun at a Caribbean resort and enjoying the fruits of a lifetime of hard work with a frothy drink in one hand and a bottle of sunscreen in the other. In fact, he could own that resort, probably a whole chain of them, and still have enough left over to exceed the annual gross domestic product of many small countries.

Jack Bogle could’ve been a billionaire — but that’s not who Jack Bogle is...
and
Bill Bernstein wrote:The plain fact of the matter is that the very structure of the modern financial system is corrupt to the core, extracting wealth from the nation’s ordinary people and placing it in the hands of a very few, and Jack has spent the better part of his life exposing these inequities. This has not made him a lot of friends in the business.
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
User avatar
Bylo Selhi
Veteran Contributor
Veteran Contributor
Posts: 29494
Joined: 16 Feb 2005 10:36
Location: Waterloo, ON
Contact:

Re: 10 Questions for John Bogle

Post by Bylo Selhi »

[Original FT paywall link: ‘I’m trying to work shorter days’.] Via Google's back door: ‘I’m trying to work shorter days’
What is the secret of your success?

I think life is much more about the journey than the destination, and, to me, success implies that
you’ve reached a destination and that your journey is complete. I’m not one to ever view my journey as complete.

That said, you need to have a bit of determination to get anywhere in life. We have a family motto: “Press on regardless.” By regardless I mean through tough times and easy times. You press on, no matter how things are going.

What is your basic business philosophy?

Two things. Number one, always put your clients first. You are a trustee of their money, and you
serve the client before you serve yourself.

Second, be mathematically correct, because if you have the maths on your side you will win. We all know that if the stock market delivers a 7 per cent gross return on your investment, an investor’s net return will be lower by the amount of the costs they incur. The average investor will lose 2.5 per cent to the Wall Street croupiers, who rake off their commissions, fees and administrative charges.

Over 50 years the impact of that annual fee is enormous. The investor will end up with less than 30 per cent of the market’s cumulative return, even though they put up all of the capital and took all of the risk. The idea is to reduce costs as much as possible. That is how Vanguard works. Our costs are two-tenths of 1 per cent...

What is your advice to investors?

I believe it is prudent to own a balanced index fund, with 60 per cent in the stock market and 40 per cent in the bond market. Then forget it. Don’t worry. Stay the course. An easy way of thinking about asset allocation is to make your bond allocation equal to your age. So, at my age, 81, I have about 80 per cent of my money in bonds and the rest in equities. I am very happy being conservative.
Sedulously eschew obfuscatory hyperverbosity and prolixity.
Post Reply